Performance plan program assistant

Part 2: The Individual Performance Outcomes which delineate three to five additional critical elements. Critical elements or outcomes may be viewed as the targeted deliverables at the end stage of an activity or outcomes. They are the products, services, or other tangible or intangibles that "leave" the office or program and are intended to serve the needs of a client.

They are impact statements. They may convey a reduction of costs, increased satisfaction by clients, more effective patient treatments, or the reduction in the degree or severity of a disease in a given population. Activities performed by the employee lead to outcomes. Activities are described using verbs Example: Employee conducts test.

Outcomes are described using nouns Example: Five tests conducted daily in compliance with unit standards for quality. Appraisal Form Contents 2. Definitions The second example is preferred, as it includes a measure and focuses on the end-result of what is conducted the tests rather than the activity or effort leading to it. M easurable: Outcomes are being achieved in comparison to a standard. T imely: Results are measured in terms of deadlines, due dates, schedules, or cycles.

Sample Critical Element Statements The following are fictitious examples of critical elements that might appear as Individual Performance Outcome Critical Element Descriptions on appraisal forms: Four publications disseminated by second quarter. Two research forums convened that further stated IC goals and incorporate management, stakeholder, and client specifications and requirements.

Customized Leadership Development courses delivered to participants by Dec. Figure 5 outlines an example of key result areas and performance measures that can be incorporated in a plan. Page Updated: 25 May Back to top.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again. This website uses Google Analytics to collect anonymous information such as the number of visitors to the site, and the most popular pages. Hit enter to search or ESC to close.

Close Search. Page Contents Click To Jump. About SnackNation SnackNation is a healthy office snack delivery service that makes healthy snacking fun, life more productive, and workplaces awesome. Connor Garrett January 13, Connor Garrett January 11, Carri Helman January 6, Nicole says:. May 7, at pm. Manoel says:. May 10, at pm. Kathey Walker says:. July 9, at pm. Jeff Murphy says:. August 7, at pm. July 26, at pm. Beth says:.

August 22, at pm. Erika says:. October 2, at pm. Monica Linares says:. October 8, at pm. Jennifer says:. October 22, at am. October 22, at pm. Jass says:. October 24, at am. October 25, at pm. Abdul says:. October 30, at pm. Janet says:. November 28, at pm. November 30, at pm. RSR says:. January 23, at am. Poochie says:. Supervisors must make efforts to help employees raise their performance, or any critical element or overall, to the Achieved Expected Results level or at least to the minimum Partially Achieved Expected Results level which is required for retention in the position.

Employees who receive a Partially Achieved Expected Results summary rating are not eligible to receive a Within-Grade Increase, or a non-competitive promotion in a career ladder. If an employee receives a Partially Achieved Expected Results rating on one or more critical elements, he or she cannot receive a summary rating of higher than Achieved Expected Results, regardless of the aggregate summary rating.

A summary rating of Achieved Unsatisfactory Results must be assigned to any employee who is rated at the Achieved Unsatisfactory Results level on any critical element.

During these discussions, the performance plan should be reviewed and the employee specifically informed of how he or she failed to meet the established standards.

These discussions should outline specific efforts that both the supervisor and the employee will take to assist the employee in overcoming problems. In accordance with 5 U. Awards and Executive Branch Budgetary Limitations Successful individual employee accomplishments and contributions enable organizations to meet their goals. These achievements will be considered when determining and assigning final ratings, conferring recognition and rewards, identifying potential training needs, and planning future assignments.

Performance awards are an integral part of the performance appraisal process. As such, they are linked to the rating of record, and submitted and considered for approval only at the conclusion of the rating period. Employees whose performance is at the Achieved More than Expected Results level may be eligible to receive a performance award payment of up to four 4 percent of salary. Employees whose performance is at the Achieved Expected Results level may be eligible to receive a performance award payment of up to three 3 percent of salary.

According to OPM, no employee is entitled to an award. However, employees will not receive both a QSI and a cash award for the same performance. QSIs shall only be awarded based on an employee receiving an Achieved Outstanding Results summary rating for the previous rating cycle, and not for midyear performance accomplishments.

Further, a QSI may not be granted to an employee who has received a QSI within the preceding fifty 52 consecutive calendar weeks.

All employees rated at the Achieved Outstanding Results level should be paid first. Any remaining cash balance will be paid out in cash. However, OPM prohibits any conversion of a Time-Off award to cash and further discourages allowing employees any option between different types of awards given the potential tax consequences.

Departments may spend no more than the percentage determined by OMB currently 0. The Office of Human Resources will transmit this percentage each fiscal year throughout the Department. The Department as a whole must not exceed this calculated budgetary cap on awards. Disagreement with the Rating Employees are encouraged to discuss disagreements with the Rating Official in an attempt to resolve issues informally.

For RIF purposes, the rating of record is the annual summary rating required at the time specified in this guidance. A Rating Official may not assign an employee a new rating of record for the sole purpose of affecting their retention standing.